Juror Expectations: Successfully Utilizing Forensic Animation in Courtroom Proceedings

As our society becomes increasingly saturatedthat an event is possible in space and time.
with technology, jurors will expect the use ofFor the purpose of admissibility, a final
more complex and accurate visual aids in theconsideration is to not confuse computer
courtroom.  Jurors, especially of the youngeranimation with computer simulations. Computer
generation, have come to count on visual mediasimulations are different in that they present the
to augment their understanding of a topic.computer calculations as the expert, not the user.
Eyewitness perspectives, cognitive memory, andThe results of a computer process are presented
perception of events and time are subject toas the opinion. These cases are extremely
intense examination by attorneys.  Experiencedproblematic and should be avoided at all costs. It
lawyers are adept at using rhetoric and verbalis impossible, unless you own extremely
manipulation to produce doubt about a witnessessophisticated and expensive software, to input all
credibility. Without the use of visual aids, manythe possible physical properties of objects and
participants feel lost in the unfamiliar process ofinteractions that take place in space and time.
courtroom proceedings. Most witnesses are notNASA and the military have shown that even
prepared to counter highly trainedthese sophisticated algorithms are subject to fail.
cross-examination tactics. Once an accurate andTo get the most out of a forensic animation
compelling visual is presented, this edge diminishesinvestment, hire someone who is both
significantly. Properly prepared visuals can give aexperienced in 3D software and trained in classical
witness more control, which is why animations areanimation. This may seem unimportant, but
so vigorously attacked by opposing counsel. Mostclassically trained animators are adept at making
media outlets have already adopted the use ofany objects movement look “real”.  If
computer animation to present visual concepts,movement looks real to jurors, it will be perceived
and it is only a matter of time before theas such. The human eye can perceive the
technology gains wide acceptance in the legalslightest error in locomotion. Classically trained
profession.animators understand how objects move through
To successfully use forensic animation, think ofspace and time, and more importantly, how the
the technology as an evolution of the chalkboard.human eye interprets these motions. It is the
To an experienced practitioner, the process is notprecise interpretation of events, realism and
complex. A forensic animator presents visualsaccuracy that make a great forensic animation. It
based on documented evidence and expertdoes not make sense to spend thousands of
consultation. The particulars of a case determinedollars recreating a scene only to have someone
the type of expert needed, but one should bewalking around like a robot.
utilized.  Flashy camera moves andWhen used correctly, forensic animation can be a
undocumented assets jeopardize an animationshighly persuasive tool. It is currently available and
admissibility. Nothing should be presented without aaffordable to the masses. As with any new
solid foundation. In fact, the majority of a forensictechnological investment, be sure to thoroughly
animator’s time is spent documenting processresearch the options available. Looking into the
and foundation. A forensic animator only needs tofuture, courtroom technology is headed quickly on
be an expert in the software used, and must bea path toward full event emersion. The ability to
able to demonstrate the accuracy of theimmerse jurors in any situation will complete our
animation both in space (dimensions) and timetheoretical evolution of the chalkboard and allow
(frames). At trial, a forensic animator should notparticipants to experience firsthand any event or
have an opinion on what actually occurred, onlyperspective.