The Truth About Breed Specific Legislation

Dogs are often referred to as being man's besta type of dog, not a breed.
friend, but the relationship between the two isn'tThere are several breeds that can be mistaken
always friendly. Historically, the news reported onfor a pit bull and suffer the consequences
television and in the newspapers has been knownregardless of their own deeds. Punish the deed,
to share horror stories about a dog attacking anot the breed is the best explanation for this.
human being. In response to these attacks, theAccording to the Endangered Breed Association,
government has tried to make their communities"Although BSL has focused on a few breeds such
feel safe by instituting different animal-relatedas pit bulls, Rottweilers, and chows, statistics
laws such as laws requiring leashes, licensing lawsshow that serious attacks have been inflicted by
and laws against organized dog fights. When thesea variety of dog breeds, including many which
laws failed to reduce dog attacks, thehave not been subject to BSL.
government proposed what is referred to asIn addition, opponents of BSL have pointed out
"breed specific legislation" - which is defined by thethat those in charge of law enforcement do not
American Kennel Club as a statute or regulationalways accurately identify breeds, and that the
that is directed towards one or more specificimposition of penalties on dogs and their owners
breed of dogs.merely as a result of breed identification can be
These laws focus mainly on breeds that haveunjust and arbitrary." A serious concern in
traditionally been labeled as dangerous. Breedcommunities is organized dog fighting and criminals
specific legislation (BSL) is an ineffective way towho use dogs for illegal purposes. The
deal with this ongoing problem and should not begovernment thought the easiest way to solve
allowed. Breed specific legislation started in thethis problem was to ban pit bulls and rottweilers
1980's as a response to an increase ofwhich are often the breeds that are the victim of
dog-related fatalities and attacks. These laws arethese crimes.
often the government's way of showing itsStatistics have shown that criminals simply switch
community that it has taken some sort of actionto a breed that is not banned and the problems
regarding a current problem.remains. Most BSL aims to ban large breed dogs
From various states, including New Mexico andsuch as shepherds, pit bulls or rottweilers. But
Florida, these laws range from banning theaccording to Pit Bull Rescue Central, it is these
breeding (or otherwise acquiring a particular breedlarge breed dogs that are best suited for jobs in
altogether) to giving the officials the authority tothe service industry that assist humans such as
seize and euthanize said breed if discovered.therapy dogs, assisting a handicapped person,
Depending on the actual laws in place, each statesearch and rescue, and police dogs. It is inhumane
has experienced a wide range of results.to rely on these animals to work with and love us
Denver, for example, claims its breed specificand then demand the entire breed be euthanized
legislation has dramatically reduced dog attacks.without cause.
After four years of enforcing their BSL, IowaBSL does not allow for exceptions of working
alleges that their dog attacks decreased from 29dogs but instead targets all dogs of a certain
in 2004 to no attacks in 2008. Not all states findbreed- regardless of temperament or behavior. It
that these laws are noticeably effective, however.is unethical and arbitrary to euthanize an animal
Germany, Italy and Holland have all repealed theirbased solely on their breed's reputation which is
BSL after being faced with studies and statisticswhy BSL is opposed by the American Veterinary
that proved that BSL did not lower the rate ofMedical Association, American Kennel Club, ASPCA
dog -related attacks and that the dogs involved inand the Humane Society of the United States, as
the attacks were not the ones listen in the ban.well as many other prominent animal welfare
The U.S. courts are constantly faced withassociations. These organizations do not ignore the
communities proposing the repealing of BSL citingproblem of aggressive dogs but stress that BSL
these laws as unconstitutional. It is undeniable thatdoes not solve the problem. Any dog regardless
there are aggressive and dangerous dogs in ourof breed can be considered dangerous and attack
communities. These dogs (as well as their owners)a human. These organizations recommend laws
must be controlled and punished on athat affect the root of the problem- irresponsible
case-by-case basis, but BSL does not allow that.owners.
There are several reasons that BSL does notAppropriate laws would instruct owners with
work and is not enforceable. Behavior problemsaggressive dogs as well as punish the owner
exhibited by a dog are the owners' responsibilitywhen these laws are broken. Laws known as
and are not limited to large breeds only.generic vicious dog laws call for a known
Irresponsible owners lead to irresponsible and outaggressive animal to be muzzled when off his
of control dogs - regardless of size or breed. Theown property, kenneled in a escape proof
flaw with statistics about dog attacks is there isn'tconfinement when outside on his property and to
a reliable way to prove that the breeds that werenever be allowed off leash, as well a requirement
involved in the attacks are now the breeds thatthat the owner purchase a liability insurance policy.
are being banned. There are critical details thatThe AKC as well the ASPCA also offers classes
should be investigated when a dog attacks aand seminars to educate owners and help them
human being, but they are often mistakenlybecome responsible dog owners. San Francisco
ignored and considered unimportant.has had great success with their animal related
Some examples of the important facts that canlaws- specifically requiring all animals to be spayed
affect an animal is whether or not an animal isor neutered. This law has not only decreased the
spayed/neutered, how much time has passedpercentage of animals in shelters but is effective
since they were last fed, whether they havebecause an unneutered dog of any breed is twice
been tethered or chained outside for long periodsas likely to bite as a neutered dog. All these
of time, their past exposure to social interactionsalternatives allow each dog and owner to be
with humans, and how much care they are shownjudged by their deeds and not their reputation.
by their caretakers. These details are the directEvery year studies and statistics continue to
responsibility of a dog owner and are clearly withinprove the ineffectiveness of breed specific
the owners' control. Like racism in humans, certainlegislation. As long as these laws are enforced,
breeds of dogs (usually large dogs) are riddledresponsible dog owners will continue to suffer the
with negative stereotypes that the Americanconsequences of irresponsible owners as well as
public instantly associates with them. Breeds andcountless dogs arbitrarily losing their lives through
mixed dogs can be hard to identify. As a result,no fault of their own. Breed specific legislation is
innocent dogs are being euthanized as a result ofineffective and should not be allowed.
stereotyping and paranoia. For example, "pit bull" is